Spring Consultation 2025

On Wednesday 2nd April 2025, the Sounding Board met virtually via Microsoft Teams to take part in the Spring Consultation.

The Sounding Board presented to regarding the following topics:

  • Linking Genetic Data for Research in Wales | Beata Fonferko- Shadrach (Swansea University)
  • Test Directory – Frequently Asked Questions | Sian Morgan (AWMGS)
  • Genomics Research Strategy – Update | Delyth Morgan (Welsh Government)
  • GPW Alumni Network – Update | Alice Frenken (Genomics Partnership Wales)

Updates from the GPW Programme Board

Session leads: Sarah Milosevic, Georgina Ferguson-Glover

  • Genomics Showcase
    • In-person event Spring 2026 to boost genomics awareness in Wales
    • Sounding Board involvement in planning and presentations encouraged
  • Festival of Genomics 2026
    • Positive feedback from 2025 event; aiming for more Sounding Board attendance
  • AI in Healthcare
    • Used in imaging, pathology, and team meeting optimisation
  • Pharmacogenomics Plan
    • Three-year plan to embed pharmacogenomics in clinical practice
  • Social Media
    • Active on Facebook, LinkedIn; exploring TikTok, BlueSky
    • Ideas: quick questions, lived stories, myth-busting, digital ads
  • Young People’s Genomics Café
    • Advisory group for ages 16–25 hosted by Wales Gene Park
  • Sounding Board Feedback
    • Members value sharing diverse views, empowerment, and involvement
    • Highlights include conferences, learning, and networking

Consultation 1 – Linking Genetic Data for Research in Wales

Session Lead: Beata Fonferko-Shadrach, Research Officer, Swansea University

Beata Fonferko-Shadrach presented a study assessing equity and outcomes of genetic testing for common conditions in Wales, using linked genetic and health data via the SAIL databank.

Key Points from the Session:

  • Conditions selected (e.g., epilepsy, BRCA, Huntington’s) were based on data availability and years of testing.
  • Feedback from the Sounding Board highlighted that the patient information sheet was too technical. Suggestions included simplifying language, using FAQs, and making it more person-centred.
  • A shorter version is being shared with charities/support groups.
  • The team cannot contact individuals directly but will promote the study via the AWMGS website and charities. An email will be provided for opt-outs.
  • Although not targeting underserved groups, the study’s goal is to identify inequalities in access based on factors like location, language, and socioeconomic status.
  • All tested individuals are included, regardless of results.

 

Anonymisation and Ethics:

  • Data in SAIL is encrypted and anonymised; individuals cannot opt out once their data is in the system.
  • The study has Confidentiality Advisory Group (CAG) approval.
  • Currently, the study does not include ethnicity data, but future linkage with census data is being explored.

 

Breakout Discussions:
Participants generally supported the use of anonymised data for research, recognizing its potential to improve healthcare. However, some concerns included:

  • Data security and transparency about how SAIL operates.
  • Psychological and privacy concerns, especially for people with rare or sensitive conditions.
  • The importance of being upfront about the possibility of data being reused in other studies.
  • Participants called for better public education, visual materials, and outreach—especially for rural and digitally excluded communities.

 

Recommendations to Reduce Opt-Outs:

  • Increase public awareness through leaflets, posters, infographics, and social media.
  • Use simple language to explain how genetic data helps research.
  • Offer clear consent processes and update participants on how their data is being used.
  • Show appreciation for public contributions (e.g., via recognition platforms).

 

Participants emphasized the importance of trust, transparency, and clear communication to ensure continued public support for data sharing in genetic research.

Test Directory – Frequently Asked Questions

Session Lead: Sian Morgan, Head of Laboratory, AWMGS

1) Is England’s genomics service more advanced than Wales’, and will Welsh patients benefit from the English network?

Sian explained that Wales was the first NHS system to introduce rapid whole genome sequencing (WGS) in 2020 and has since expanded capacity with government investment. While not all tests are available in Wales, samples can be sent to other UK labs to ensure equitable access. She noted that the centralised testing model in England is set to change by 2026, and Wales is preparing to adapt accordingly.

 

2) Are all Welsh Health Boards aligned with the genomics service?

It was confirmed that AWMGS provides testing consistently across Wales, achieving a diagnostic yield of around 30–40%, a significant improvement from previous rates.

 

3) How unified are Welsh services with England’s? Should Wales collaborate more or maintain independence?

Sian emphasized that all services undergo strict governance and value-based review. Given the specialized nature of genomics, collaboration across the UK is common. She noted that the Joint Commissioning Committee supports Welsh access to all approved tests, and ongoing discussions help tailor services to Welsh clinical needs.

 

4) Do WGS tests communicate incidental findings beyond the suspected condition?

It was confirmed that testing is targeted based on clinical suspicion using gene panels to minimize incidental findings, with governance procedures in place to carefully manage any unexpected results.

 

5) Will expertise remain if testing shifts away from Exeter?

Sian described how centralised sequencing is done in Cambridge, with sample preparation in Birmingham. Exeter runs urgent tests for England. She assured that collaboration between centres ensures no loss of care quality for Wales regardless of sequencing location.

 

6) What are the hopes for genomics’ future?

Sian highlighted advances in cancer genomics for personalized medicine, the need for a genomics-educated healthcare workforce, and goals to improve rare disease diagnosis rates.

 

7) How is test review managed, and what defines urgent testing?

It was explained that reviews align with NICE, WHO, and professional guidance, with appraisals automatically included in the Test Directory. Urgent tests are those critical for clinical care, such as prenatal screening or pharmacogenomics for cancer treatment.

 

Q: Are there genetic tests prioritized for Wales’ population?

Sian noted that a Wales-specific screening for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy previously existed but is no longer active.

 

Q: How are conditions prioritized for testing?

Sian clarified that prioritization is based on clinical utility, validity, cost, and patient benefit, following strict criteria for each test provided.

 

Genomics Research Strategy – Update

Session Lead: Delyth Morgan, Head of Life Sciences Research & Industry Partnerships, Welsh Government

Delyth provided an update on the Genomics Research Strategy, covering its development, feedback, and next steps.

  • The Genomics Delivery Plan for Wales includes a commitment to create a Genomics Research Strategy, developed collaboratively by Health and Care Research Wales (HCRW) and Genomics Partnership Wales.
  • The Genomics Research Review Group (GRRG) was formed to gather information, supported by IQVIA’s background research.
  • A smaller working group drafted the strategy over summer 2024; the draft is now out for consultation.
  • The strategy has received endorsements from HCRW, GPW, Welsh Higher Education Institutions, and the GPW Public and Patient Sounding Board.
  • Feedback from consultations is generally supportive, with calls for firmer commitments, clear progress measures, timelines, stronger collaborations across Welsh/UK universities, NHS, government, and funders, and focus on translating research into clinical benefits for patients.

 

Next Steps:

  • Finalise feedback collection and address engagement queries
  • Incorporate feedback, gather endorsements, and prepare an introduction
  • Invite expressions of interest for leadership roles
  • Work with communications for presentation, followed by translation and publication

 

The First Minister supports accelerating the strategy to improve patient outcomes in Wales. The Welsh Government will endorse the plan, potentially with a foreword from the Chief Medical Officer.

Support for Areas that are not seen as strength within Wales

  • The strategy highlights Welsh research strengths but does not exclude other areas.
  • It aims to improve patient access to clinical trials and promote collaboration across the UK to ensure a joined-up approach to care.

GPW Alumni Network Update

Session Lead: Alice Frenken, Project Manager (GPW)

Alice provided an update on developments since the January 2025 Consultation on the GPW Alumni Network.

Key discussion points included:

  • Creating more inclusive opportunities for alumni who prefer to contribute behind the scenes (e.g., document development, information sharing, policy review).
  • Alumni could help scribe during Sounding Board consultations.
  • All involvement opportunities are shared with Alumni unless specific Sounding Board input is needed.
  • Alumni can join by completing a form from GPW, stay as long as they wish, and leave at any time by request.